Re: Memory allocation problem with 2.6.22 after suspend/resume cycle

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...>, Len Brown <lenb@...>
Date: Sunday, September 23, 2007 - 8:38 am

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

Yes. I do not (yet) have a choice... can't wait for the open source drivers.



Which? the 32bit or the 64bit?

Regards,
Chris


-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Memory allocation problem with 2.6.22 after suspend/resume c..., Christian P. Schmidt, (Sat Sep 22, 11:41 am)
Re: Memory allocation problem with 2.6.22 after suspend/resu..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sat Sep 22, 6:00 pm)
Re: Memory allocation problem with 2.6.22 after suspend/resu..., Christian P. Schmidt, (Sun Sep 23, 8:38 am)
Re: Memory allocation problem with 2.6.22 after suspend/resu..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Sep 23, 9:03 am)
Re: Memory allocation problem with 2.6.22 after suspend/resu..., Christian P. Schmidt, (Sun Sep 23, 12:19 pm)
Re: Memory allocation problem with 2.6.22 after suspend/resu..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Sep 23, 2:28 pm)
Re: Memory allocation problem with 2.6.22 after suspend/resu..., Christian P. Schmidt, (Sun Sep 23, 3:18 pm)
Re: Memory allocation problem with 2.6.22 after suspend/resu..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Sep 23, 4:12 pm)