On Sat, 22 Sep 2007, WANG Cong wrote:

quoted text
> >Summary:
> >  CC      mm/slub.o
> >mm/slub.c: In function 'kfree':
> >mm/slub.c:2491: warning: passing argument 3 of 'slab_free' discards
> >qualifiers from pointer target type

static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page,
                                        void *x, void *addr)
but ..

void kfree(const void *x)

void is not the same as const void.
					
quoted text
> >  CC      fs/autofs4/symlink.o
> >fs/autofs4/symlink.c: In function 'autofs4_follow_link':
> >fs/autofs4/symlink.c:18: warning: passing argument 2 of 'nd_set_link'
> >discards qualifiers from pointer target type

Once again ino->u.symlink is a const char and it's dropping the const.

quoted text
> 
> These two warnings are suspicious. Explicit casts are already there, how
> they come out? Or gcc bugs?
> 

gcc is perfectly justified when warning about dropping const. 

	Gerhard


--
Gerhard Mack

gmack@innerfire.net

<>< As a computer I find your faith in technology amusing.
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/