Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2007 » September » 22

Re: Should parent's WIFSIGNALED(siginfo->si_status) be true EVEN IF the SIGNAL was caught by the child?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...>
To: John Z. Bohach <jzb2@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>
Subject: Re: Should parent's WIFSIGNALED(siginfo-&gt;si_status) be true EVEN IF the SIGNAL was caught by the child?
Date: Saturday, September 22, 2007 - 7:35 pm

"John Z. Bohach" <jzb2@aexorsyst.com> writes:


That does not make any sense.  si_status is _not_ a wait status.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
Should parent's WIFSIGNALED(siginfo-&gt;si_status) be true E..., John Z. Bohach, (Sat Sep 22, 2:22 pm)
Re: Should parent's WIFSIGNALED(siginfo-&gt;si_status) be tr..., Nicholas Miell, (Sat Sep 22, 2:52 pm)
Re: Should parent's WIFSIGNALED(siginfo-&gt;si_status) be tr..., Michael Kerrisk, (Sat Sep 22, 2:49 pm)
Re: Should parent's WIFSIGNALED(siginfo-&gt;si_status) be tr..., John Z. Bohach, (Sat Sep 22, 4:18 pm)
Re: Should parent's WIFSIGNALED(siginfo->si_status) be tr..., Andreas Schwab, (Sat Sep 22, 7:35 pm)
Re: Should parent's WIFSIGNALED(siginfo-&gt;si_status) be tr..., John Z. Bohach, (Sat Sep 22, 9:05 pm)