[patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Saturday, September 22, 2007 - 3:29 pm

Sorry, it took me quite a while to realize the real root cause of the
VAIO - and probably many other machines - suspend/resume regressions,
which were unearthed by the dyntick / clockevents patches.

We disable a lot of ACPI/BIOS functionality during suspend, but we
keep the lower idle C-states functionality active across
suspend/resume. It seems that this causes trouble with certain BIOSes,
but I assume that the problem is more wide spread and just not
surfacing due to the various scenarios in which a machine goes into
suspend/resume. I spent some quality time to figure out a set of debug
mechanisms, which did not influence the problem. So it is quite likely
that a lot of machines might be affected by this, but due to the
configuration, interrupt scenarios, .... the problem just does
not show up. 

My final enlightment was, when I removed the ACPI processor module,
which controls the lower idle C-states, right before resume; this
worked fine all the time even without all the workaround hacks.

I really hope that this two patches finally set an end to the "jinxed
VAIO heisenbug series", which started when we removed the periodic
tick with the clockevents/dyntick patches.

Venki, can you please add the analogous fix to the cpuidle patch set ?

Thanks,

	tglx
-- 

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes, Thomas Gleixner, (Sat Sep 22, 3:29 pm)
Re: [patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Sep 22, 3:59 pm)
Re: [patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes, Thomas Gleixner, (Sat Sep 22, 4:30 pm)
Re: [patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes, Oleg Verych, (Sat Sep 22, 6:20 pm)
Re: [patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Sep 22, 8:11 pm)
Re: [patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes, Mihai , (Sat Sep 22, 10:24 pm)
Re: [patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Sep 23, 3:29 am)
Re: [patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes, Alan Cox, (Sun Sep 23, 5:30 am)
Re: [patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes, Matthew Garrett, (Sun Sep 23, 7:06 am)
Re: [patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes, Mark Lord, (Fri Sep 28, 1:27 pm)
Re: [patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes, Thomas Gleixner, (Fri Sep 28, 1:33 pm)
Re: [patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes, Alan Cox, (Fri Sep 28, 2:04 pm)
Re: [patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes, Mark Lord, (Fri Sep 28, 2:17 pm)
Re: [patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Sep 28, 2:40 pm)
Re: [patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes, Bill Davidsen, (Sat Sep 29, 10:12 am)