Re: [PATCH] [32/45] x86_64: hide cond_syscall behind __KERNEL__

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Saturday, September 22, 2007 - 2:30 am

On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 10:45:14PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:


This is the previous __KERNEL__ block.


And this  one shouldn't extent iver the declarations of sys_iopl
and sys_rt_sigactions I think.  If it should be there at all.

So please make this file at least semi-clean while you're at it instead
of much worse.

The __KERNEL__ block should also be extended over the various __ARCH_WANT_
definitions because they're not for userspace at all.

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] [0/45] x86 2.6.24 patches review I, Andi Kleen, (Fri Sep 21, 1:44 pm)
[PATCH] [1/45] x86: misc. constifications, Andi Kleen, (Fri Sep 21, 1:44 pm)
[PATCH] [2/45] x86: constify stacktrace_ops, Andi Kleen, (Fri Sep 21, 1:44 pm)
[PATCH] [4/45] i386: Rewrite sched_clock, Andi Kleen, (Fri Sep 21, 1:44 pm)
[PATCH] [25/45] x86_64: remove sync_Arb_IDs, Andi Kleen, (Fri Sep 21, 1:45 pm)
[PATCH] [31/45] i386: make struct apic_probe static, Andi Kleen, (Fri Sep 21, 1:45 pm)
[PATCH] [33/45] i386: es7000 minor cleanups, Andi Kleen, (Fri Sep 21, 1:45 pm)
[PATCH] [35/45] i386: make some variables static, Andi Kleen, (Fri Sep 21, 1:45 pm)
[PATCH] [41/45] i386: remove unnecessary code, Andi Kleen, (Fri Sep 21, 1:45 pm)
Re: [PATCH] [24/45] x86: Introduce frame_pointer() and sta ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Sat Sep 22, 2:26 am)
Re: [PATCH] [32/45] x86_64: hide cond_syscall behind __KER ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Sat Sep 22, 2:30 am)