On Sat, 22 Sep 2007, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:i brought up this issue on the KJ list once upon a time: https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/kernel-janitors/2007-February/017847.html and there didn't seem to be much enthusiasm for it. however, i am still curious why there isn't more use of the already-defined "clear_page" macro. most architectures appear to define it: $ grep -r "define.*clear_page" include but there are still numerous explicit calls to memset() to zero a chunk of memory that is exactly PAGE_SIZE in size. just an observation. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca ======================================================================== -
| Mike Galbraith | Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke |
| Andi Kleen | [PATCH] [3/22] x86_64: Kill temp boot pmds |
| Alan Cox | Re: [PATCH][RFC] 4K stacks default, not a debug thing any more...? |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 05/37] dccp: Cleanup routines for feature negotiation |
| Brandeburg, Jesse | RE: [PATCH] e1000e: test MSI interrupts |
