On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 09:19:22PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:Might be that the other machine has its 2.6.22 version of .config messed up. I will try booting it on a stock 2.6.22 kernel when it comes back to life -- not sure I ever did that before. Besides, the other similar machine seems to have gone down for the count, but without me torturing it... Also, keep in mind that various stages can "record" a memory misordering, for example, by incrementing the wrong counter. The other machine not only booted, but has survived several minutes of rcutorture thus far. I am also trying POWER5 machine as well, as the one currently running is a POWER4, which is a bit less aggressive about memory reordering than is the POWER5. Even if they pass, I refuse to reduce GP_STAGES until proven safe. Trust me, you -don't- want to be unwittingly making use of a subtely busted RCU implementation!!! Thanx, Paul -
| Scott Preece | Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections |
| Luis R. Rodriguez | Re: [Announce] Linux-tiny project revival |
| Andrew Morton | 2.6.23-rc1-mm2 |
| Dave Hansen | [PATCH 02/24] rearrange may_open() to be r/o friendly |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| David Miller | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
