From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>
It doesn't seem to make sense to hide these, even if their counts
can't change at the point in time they're being displayed.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
arch/i386/kernel/irq.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
arch/x86_64/kernel/irq.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Index: linux/arch/i386/kernel/irq.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/i386/kernel/irq.c
+++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/irq.c
@@ -259,9 +259,17 @@ int show_interrupts(struct seq_file *p,
}
if (i < NR_IRQS) {
+ unsigned any_count = 0;
+
spin_lock_irqsave(&irq_desc[i].lock, flags);
+#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
+ any_count = kstat_irqs(i);
+#else
+ for_each_online_cpu(j)
+ any_count |= kstat_cpu(j).irqs[i];
+#endif
action = irq_desc[i].action;
- if (!action)
+ if (!action && !any_count)
goto skip;
seq_printf(p, "%3d: ",i);
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -272,10 +280,12 @@ int show_interrupts(struct seq_file *p,
#endif
seq_printf(p, " %8s", irq_desc[i].chip->name);
seq_printf(p, "-%-8s", irq_desc[i].name);
- seq_printf(p, " %s", action->name);
- for (action=action->next; action; action = action->next)
- seq_printf(p, ", %s", action->name);
+ if (action) {
+ seq_printf(p, " %s", action->name);
+ while ((action = action->next) != NULL)
+ seq_printf(p, ", %s", action->name);
+ }
seq_putc(p, '\n');
skip:
Index: linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/irq.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/irq.c
+++ linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/irq.c
@@ -64,9 +64,17 @@ int show_interrupts(struct seq_file *p,
}
if (i < NR_IRQS) {
+ unsigned any_count = 0;
+
spin_lock_irqsave(&irq_desc[i].lock, flags);
+#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
+ any_count = kstat_irqs(i);
+#else
+ for_each_online_cpu(j)
+ any_count |= kstat_cpu(j).irqs[i];
+#endif
action = irq_desc[i].action;
- if (!action)
+ if (!action && !any_count)
goto skip;
seq_printf(p, "%3d: ",i);
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -78,9 +86,11 @@ int show_interrupts(struct seq_file *p,
seq_printf(p, " %8s", irq_desc[i].chip->name);
seq_printf(p, "-%-8s", irq_desc[i].name);
- seq_printf(p, " %s", action->name);
- for (action=action->next; action; action = action->next)
- seq_printf(p, ", %s", action->name);
+ if (action) {
+ seq_printf(p, " %s", action->name);
+ while ((action = action->next) != NULL)
+ seq_printf(p, ", %s", action->name);
+ }
seq_putc(p, '\n');
skip:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq_desc[i].lock, flags);
-
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| James Bottomley | Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-)) |
| Andrew Morton | echo mem > /sys/power/state |
| Peter Zijlstra | [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8 |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 18/37] dccp: Support for Mandatory options |
| Michael S. Tsirkin | Re: [RFC PATCH v2 03/19] vbus: add connection-client helper infrastructure |
| NeilBrown | [PATCH 00/18] Assorted md patches headed for 2.6.30 |
| Justin Piszcz | General question (scheduler) with SSDs? |
| Neil Brown | Re: Any hope for a 27 disk RAID6+1HS array with four disks reporting "No md superb... |
| Ryan Wagoner | High IO Wait with RAID 1 |
