Re: x86_64: potential critical issue with quicklists and page table pages

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Siddha, Suresh B <suresh.b.siddha@...>
Cc: <clameter@...>, <akpm@...>, <ak@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <tony.luck@...>, <asit.k.mallick@...>
Date: Friday, September 21, 2007 - 2:48 pm

On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:

Hmm? We only add them to the quicklists in the exact same places where we 
*used* to just free them entirely. So I don't see why semantics would have 
changed..


I'll happily revert it, but I want to understand this better, so more of 
an explanation of the codepath that actually does something wrong, please.

		Linus
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: x86_64: potential critical issue with quicklists and pag..., Christoph Lameter, (Fri Sep 21, 2:48 pm)
Re: x86_64: potential critical issue with quicklists and pag..., Linus Torvalds, (Fri Sep 21, 2:48 pm)
Re: x86_64: potential critical issue with quicklists and pag..., Christoph Lameter, (Fri Sep 21, 2:50 pm)
Re: x86_64: potential critical issue with quicklists and pag..., Christoph Lameter, (Fri Sep 21, 3:07 pm)
Re: x86_64: potential critical issue with quicklists and pag..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Mon Sep 24, 5:27 pm)
Re: x86_64: potential critical issue with quicklists and pag..., Christoph Lameter, (Mon Sep 24, 5:42 pm)
Re: x86_64: potential critical issue with quicklists and pag..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Mon Sep 24, 8:09 pm)
Re: x86_64: potential critical issue with quicklists and pag..., Christoph Lameter, (Fri Sep 21, 3:26 pm)
Re: x86_64: potential critical issue with quicklists and pag..., Christoph Lameter, (Fri Sep 21, 3:56 pm)
RE: x86_64: potential critical issue with quicklists and pag..., Christoph Lameter, (Fri Sep 21, 4:15 pm)