Re: [linux-pm] [RFC][PATCH 0/2 -mm] kexec based hibernation -v3

Previous thread: [PATCH 16/22] NFS: Display local caching state by David Howells on Friday, September 21, 2007 - 10:48 am. (36 messages)

Next thread: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC][PATCH 0/2 -mm] kexec based hibernation -v3 by Mika Penttilä on Friday, September 21, 2007 - 11:13 am. (1 message)
To: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@...>
Cc: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@...>, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...>, <nigel@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <jbms@...>, <linux-pm@...>, Kexec Mailing List <kexec@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Friday, September 21, 2007 - 10:56 am

Ok I see. But should the kernel B's e820 mem map be limited to 1m-16m in
order not to allocate pages found also in A's space? Or does does the
--mem-min and --mem-max do that also?
Thanks,
Mika

-

Previous thread: [PATCH 16/22] NFS: Display local caching state by David Howells on Friday, September 21, 2007 - 10:48 am. (36 messages)

Next thread: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC][PATCH 0/2 -mm] kexec based hibernation -v3 by Mika Penttilä on Friday, September 21, 2007 - 11:13 am. (1 message)