Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2007 » September » 21

Re: [Celinux-dev] Re: [Announce] Linux-tiny project revival

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Scott Preece <sepreece@...>
To: Tim Bird <tim.bird@...>, Rob Landley <rob@...>
Cc: <linux-tiny@...>, linux kernel <linux-kernel@...>, CE Linux Developers List <celinux-dev@...>, Michael Opdenacker <michael@...>
Subject: Re: [Celinux-dev] Re: [Announce] Linux-tiny project revival
Date: Friday, September 21, 2007 - 9:05 am

----- Original Message ----
From: Tim Bird <tim.bird@am.sony.com>

Rob Landley wrote:


Given that there are about 60,000 printks in the kernel (and that's
not counting wrappers like dprintk() and other locally-defined
functions and macros) it would be a huge task to examine the code
and differentiate strings that really start a new log message
(and thus should have an attached log level) and strings
that don't.
 -- Tim

---

So, if this is a good idea, maybe the new version with the separate argument should have a new name? Then you can mechanically convert the onces that fit the pattern to the new name and form and leave the others to clean up later.

scott



-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
Re: [Celinux-dev] Re: [Announce] Linux-tiny project revival, Scott Preece, (Fri Sep 21, 9:05 am)