On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, J. Bruce Fields wrote:... Bruce - you're losing authorship information. Please don't do that. Put a From: Wolfgang Walter <wolfgang.walter@studentenwerk.mhn.de> at the top of the email, so that the author gets properly attributed. I don't know how many of these I've missed - in this case I just ended up googling for the commit message because the "Signed-off-by:" lines implied that you weren't the original author, and see the real patch authorship that way. But it's *not* the case that the first sign-off is always the author, and I don't want to need to google for each patch I get, so please make it a habit to make sure that there's proper attribution for the patches. Some people (read: Andrew) go so far as to *always* do it (ie Andrew puts a "From: Andrew Morton .." at the heads of the emails he sends out), and I appreciate it. That way, even if the email then gets forwarded by somebody else (because Andrew sent it to some submaintainer instead of me), the original authorship doesn't get lost when somebody else then forwards the email. So that "always explicitly say who the author is" is a good idea, but when forwarding somebody elses patch, it's *more* than a good idea - at that point it's absolutely required for proper attribution. Linus -
| Andy Whitcroft | Re: 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| James Bottomley | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Alan | Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
git: | |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Winkler, Tomas | RE: iwlwifi: fix build bug in "iwlwifi: fix LED stall" |
