Re: UML dead with current -git?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ph. Marek
Date: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 - 10:44 pm

Hello Jeff,

Sorry, I don't understand you. What are "0=" directories? Do you mean that
if there's no include/ directory?


Well, I guess that there are non-obvious corner cases in the include/asm
symlink usage, that amateurs simply do not know ...


Regards,

Phil


-- 
Versioning your /etc, /home or even your whole installation?
             Try fsvs (fsvs.tigris.org)!
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
UML dead with current -git?, Philipp Marek, (Tue Sep 18, 8:14 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Jeff Dike, (Tue Sep 18, 10:13 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Sam Ravnborg, (Tue Sep 18, 10:55 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Philipp Marek, (Tue Sep 18, 11:09 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Jeff Dike, (Tue Sep 18, 6:35 pm)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Philipp Marek, (Wed Sep 19, 5:43 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Randy Dunlap, (Wed Sep 19, 8:50 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Philipp Marek, (Wed Sep 19, 9:17 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Randy Dunlap, (Wed Sep 19, 10:47 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Jeff Dike, (Wed Sep 19, 11:05 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Ph. Marek, (Wed Sep 19, 10:42 pm)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Ph. Marek, (Wed Sep 19, 10:44 pm)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Sam Ravnborg, (Thu Sep 20, 12:01 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Philipp Marek, (Thu Sep 20, 12:25 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Sam Ravnborg, (Thu Sep 20, 1:26 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Randy Dunlap, (Thu Sep 20, 9:35 am)