On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 19:28 +0000, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 14:26 -0500, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 12:15 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
> > 
> > > Here is the patch to clean up __GFP_NOFAIL flag in jbd/jbd2. In all
> > > cases except one handles memory allocation failure so I get rid of those
> > > GFP_NOFAIL flags.
> > > 
> > > Also, shouldn't we use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_NOFS flag for kmalloc
> > > in jbd/jbd2? I will send a separate patch to cleanup that.
> > 
> > No.  GFP_NOFS avoids deadlock.  It prevents the allocation from making
> > recursive calls back into the file system that could end up blocking on
> > jbd code.
> 
> Oh, I see your patch now.  You mean use GFP_NOFS instead of
> GFP_KERNEL.  :-)  OK then.
> 

oops, I did mean what you say here.:-)

quoted text
> > Shaggy

-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/