On Wednesday 19 September 2007 22:00, Michael Chan wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 09:30 +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> +       /* gzip header (1f,8b,08... 10 bytes total + possible asciz filename)
> +        * is stripped, 32-bit unpacked size (LE) is prepended instead */
> +       sz = *zbuf++;
> +       sz = (sz << 8) + *zbuf++;
> +       sz = (sz << 8) + *zbuf++;
> +       sz = (sz << 8) + *zbuf++;
> 
> I don't have a problem with removing the gzip header.  It doesn't
> contain very useful information other than a valid header for sanity
> check.  But I don't think we need to arbitrarily add the unpacked size
> in front of the gzipped data.  The driver knows the size (e.g. the size
> of RAM on the chip) and should pass it to the call.  The driver should
> also allocate the memory for the unpacked data instead of allocating the
> memory inside the call and freeing it by the caller.  For example, the
> driver may need to use pci_alloc_consistent() if the firmware is to be
> DMA'ed to the chip.
> 
> Other than that, everything else looks fine.  Thanks.

Are you saying that you successfully run-tested it?
--
vda
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/