Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...>, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...>, netdev <netdev@...>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 - 3:40 pm

> It has hung-on in various places (stacks) as an "accepted" broadcast IP 

Well it is valid in Linux for sending.  And who knows who relies on it.

-Andi

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Ulrich Drepper, (Wed Sep 19, 11:21 am)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Andi Kleen, (Wed Sep 19, 11:47 am)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Ulrich Drepper, (Wed Sep 19, 12:49 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Andi Kleen, (Wed Sep 19, 1:26 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Ulrich Drepper, (Wed Sep 19, 1:46 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Alan Cox, (Wed Sep 19, 2:06 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Andi Kleen, (Wed Sep 19, 1:57 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Ulrich Drepper, (Wed Sep 19, 2:02 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Andi Kleen, (Wed Sep 19, 2:30 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Rick Jones, (Wed Sep 19, 2:38 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, , (Wed Sep 19, 4:33 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Andi Kleen, (Wed Sep 19, 3:40 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, David Miller, (Wed Sep 19, 12:52 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Ulrich Drepper, (Wed Sep 19, 1:04 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Ulrich Drepper, (Wed Sep 19, 1:27 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, David Miller, (Wed Sep 19, 12:15 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Alan Cox, (Wed Sep 19, 12:39 pm)