Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...>, netdev <netdev@...>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 - 2:06 pm

On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:46:54 -0700
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> wrote:


Which is a valid address in some protocols. If I remember rightly then
appletalk net 0 node 0 port 0 is valid although I'd want to look in the
book to check that - ditto AF_ECONET although I doubt anyone cares too
much 8)

Alan
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Ulrich Drepper, (Wed Sep 19, 11:21 am)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Andi Kleen, (Wed Sep 19, 11:47 am)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Ulrich Drepper, (Wed Sep 19, 12:49 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Andi Kleen, (Wed Sep 19, 1:26 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Ulrich Drepper, (Wed Sep 19, 1:46 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Alan Cox, (Wed Sep 19, 2:06 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Andi Kleen, (Wed Sep 19, 1:57 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Ulrich Drepper, (Wed Sep 19, 2:02 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Andi Kleen, (Wed Sep 19, 2:30 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Rick Jones, (Wed Sep 19, 2:38 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, , (Wed Sep 19, 4:33 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Andi Kleen, (Wed Sep 19, 3:40 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, David Miller, (Wed Sep 19, 12:52 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Ulrich Drepper, (Wed Sep 19, 1:04 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Ulrich Drepper, (Wed Sep 19, 1:27 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, David Miller, (Wed Sep 19, 12:15 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Alan Cox, (Wed Sep 19, 12:39 pm)