On 19 Sep 2007, at 18:29, Christoph Lameter wrote:
quoted text > On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
>> There even is such a function already in mm/
>> sparse.c::vaddr_in_vmalloc_area()
>> with pretty identical content. I would suggest either this new
>> inline should
>> go away completely and use the existing one and export it or the
>> existing one
>> should go away and the inline should be used. It seems silly to
>> have two
>> functions with different names doing exactly the same thing!
>
> Just in case you have not noticed: This patchset removes the
> vaddr_in_vmalloc_area() in sparse.c
That's great! And sorry I did not notice that bit...
Best regards,
Anton
--
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @)
Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK
Linux NTFS maintainer,
http://www.linux-ntfs.org/
-
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [03/17] is_vmalloc_addr(): Check if an address is within... , Anton Altaparmakov , (Wed Sep 19, 1:52 pm)