Re: [Patch 1/2] Trace code and documentation (updated)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Wilder
Date: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 - 10:41 am

Randy Dunlap wrote:
IMHO keeping example code as standalone files under Documentation/* make 
it easy to build an play with.  I like it better than keeping it on some 
project website where it is even less likely to maintained.
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[Patch 1/2] Trace code and documentation (updated), David J. Wilder, (Tue Sep 18, 9:46 pm)
Re: [Patch 1/2] Trace code and documentation (updated), David Wilder, (Wed Sep 19, 7:14 am)
Re: [Patch 1/2] Trace code and documentation (updated), Christoph Hellwig, (Wed Sep 19, 9:20 am)
Re: [Patch 1/2] Trace code and documentation (updated), Randy Dunlap, (Wed Sep 19, 9:52 am)
Re: [Patch 1/2] Trace code and documentation (updated), Christoph Hellwig, (Wed Sep 19, 9:55 am)
Re: [Patch 1/2] Trace code and documentation (updated), David Wilder, (Wed Sep 19, 10:41 am)
Re: [Patch 1/2] Trace code and documentation (updated), Sam Ravnborg, (Wed Sep 19, 10:48 am)
Re: [Patch 1/2] Trace code and documentation (updated), Christoph Hellwig, (Wed Sep 19, 10:51 am)
Re: Test harness in the kernel for new syscalls? [Was: Tra ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Fri Sep 21, 1:08 am)
Re: [Patch 1/2] Trace code and documentation (updated), Christoph Hellwig, (Sun Sep 23, 5:46 am)
Re: [Patch 1/2] Trace code and documentation (updated), David Wilder, (Mon Sep 24, 8:16 am)