Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2007 » September » 19

Re: [03/17] is_vmalloc_addr(): Check if an address is within the vmalloc boundaries

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@...>
To: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@...>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...>, Mel Gorman <mel@...>, <linux-fsdevel@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, David Chinner <dgc@...>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...>
Subject: Re: [03/17] is_vmalloc_addr(): Check if an address is within the vmalloc boundaries
Date: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 - 1:29 pm

On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:


Tried it and that leads to all sort of other failures.
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[03/17] is_vmalloc_addr(): Check if an address is within the..., Christoph Lameter, (Tue Sep 18, 11:36 pm)
Re: [03/17] is_vmalloc_addr(): Check if an address is within..., David Rientjes, (Wed Sep 19, 2:32 am)
Re: [03/17] is_vmalloc_addr(): Check if an address is within..., Anton Altaparmakov, (Wed Sep 19, 3:24 am)
Re: [03/17] is_vmalloc_addr(): Check if an address is within..., Christoph Lameter, (Wed Sep 19, 1:29 pm)
Re: [03/17] is_vmalloc_addr(): Check if an address is within..., Anton Altaparmakov, (Wed Sep 19, 1:52 pm)
Re: [03/17] is_vmalloc_addr(): Check if an address is within..., David Rientjes, (Wed Sep 19, 4:09 am)
Re: [03/17] is_vmalloc_addr(): Check if an address is within..., Anton Altaparmakov, (Wed Sep 19, 4:44 am)
Re: [03/17] is_vmalloc_addr(): Check if an address is within..., Christoph Lameter, (Wed Sep 19, 1:29 pm)
Re: [03/17] is_vmalloc_addr(): Check if an address is within..., Anton Altaparmakov, (Wed Sep 19, 1:52 pm)
Re: [03/17] is_vmalloc_addr(): Check if an address is within..., David Rientjes, (Wed Sep 19, 5:19 am)
Re: [03/17] is_vmalloc_addr(): Check if an address is within..., Anton Altaparmakov, (Wed Sep 19, 9:23 am)