login
Header Space

 
 

Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <drepper@...>
Cc: <andi@...>, <netdev@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 - 12:52 pm

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:49:09 -0700


It just occured to me that AF_UNSPEC might be used simply
because "all zeros" might be a valid real bindable address
for some address family.  And using AF_UNSPEC avoids that
problem entirely.
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Ulrich Drepper, (Wed Sep 19, 11:21 am)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Andi Kleen, (Wed Sep 19, 11:47 am)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Ulrich Drepper, (Wed Sep 19, 12:49 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Andi Kleen, (Wed Sep 19, 1:26 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Ulrich Drepper, (Wed Sep 19, 1:46 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Alan Cox, (Wed Sep 19, 2:06 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Andi Kleen, (Wed Sep 19, 1:57 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Ulrich Drepper, (Wed Sep 19, 2:02 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Andi Kleen, (Wed Sep 19, 2:30 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Rick Jones, (Wed Sep 19, 2:38 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, , (Wed Sep 19, 4:33 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Andi Kleen, (Wed Sep 19, 3:40 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, David Miller, (Wed Sep 19, 12:52 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Ulrich Drepper, (Wed Sep 19, 1:04 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Ulrich Drepper, (Wed Sep 19, 1:27 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, David Miller, (Wed Sep 19, 12:15 pm)
Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX, Alan Cox, (Wed Sep 19, 12:39 pm)
speck-geostationary