Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.23-rc6. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions List of Aces Name Regressions fixed since 21-Jun-2007 Adrian Bunk 10 Linus Torvalds 6 Alan Stern 5 Andi Kleen 5 Hugh Dickins 5 Trond Myklebust 5 Andrew Morton 4 Al Viro 3 Alexey Starikovskiy 3 Cornelia Huck 3 David S. Miller 3 Jens Axboe 3 Stephen Hemminger 3 Tejun Heo 3 ACPI Subject : 2.6.23-rc5 hangs on boot, apparently when initializing the EC References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/11/369 Last known good : ? Submitter : Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com> Caused-By : ? Handled-By : ? Status : unknown CPUFREQ Subject : ide problems: 2.6.22-git17 working, 2.6.23-rc1* is not References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/27/298 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/29/371 Last known good : ? Submitter : dth <dth@dth.net> Caused-By : Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> commit f79e3185dd0f8650022518d7624c876d8929061b Handled-By : Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Status : problem is being debugged FS Subject : hanging ext3 dbench tests References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/11/176 Last known good : ? Submitter : Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org> Caused-By : ? Handled-By : ? Status : unknown Subject : umount triggers a warning in jfs and takes almost a minute References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/4/73 Last known good : ? Submitter : Oliver Neukum ...
A number of attempts to reproduce this on these machines has yet to re-trigger it. I guess the Status is therefore "under test -- unreproducible at present" -apw -
I'm still waiting to hear from Oliver whether or not this is actually a regression. Thanks, Shaggy -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center -
OK, I've done test. On 2.6.22 I was unable to trigger the warning. On 2.6.23-rc6 I get the following warning in about 3/4 of all unmounts: Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: WARNING: at fs/jfs/jfs_logmgr.c:1643 jfs_flush_journal() Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: Call Trace: Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: [<ffffffff8860f962>] :jfs:jfs_flush_journal+0x26a/0x27d Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: [<ffffffff8029fca1>] dispose_list+0xde/0xf7 Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: [<ffffffff885fd003>] :jfs:jfs_umount+0x30/0xe5 Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: [<ffffffff885f9a31>] :jfs:jfs_put_super+0xd/0x5e Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: [<ffffffff8028ef8f>] generic_shutdown_super+0x60/0xf0 Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: [<ffffffff8028f02c>] kill_block_super+0xd/0x1e Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: [<ffffffff8028f0f7>] deactivate_super+0x6a/0x82 Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: [<ffffffff802a2184>] sys_umount+0x249/0x25a Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: [<ffffffff802616ff>] audit_syscall_entry+0x141/0x174 Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: [<ffffffff8020be8c>] tracesys+0xdc/0xe1 Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: This is on a partition of a usb mass storage device with 2K sector size. IMHO it is a regression. I am recompiling with CONFIG_JFS_DEBUG. Regards Oliver -
Looks like a regression then. I'll take a look at the debug output and get back to you. Shaggy -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center -
Hi Michal, The NFSV4 [BUG] 2.6.23-rc5 kernel BUG at fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c:945, is again seen in 2.6.23-rc6. Can this bug be added as known regression for 2.6.23-rc6. References http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/7/27. -- Thanks & Regards, Kamalesh Babulal, Linux Technology Center, IBM, ISTL. -
I have patches which fix this, which we're testing. (See bugzilla.) Neil's working on this. Also not a regression. --b. -
