Re: iso9660 vs udf

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Satyam Sharma <satyam@...>
Cc: Andries E. Brouwer <Andries.Brouwer@...>, Jan Kara <jack@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 - 7:11 am

Satyam Sharma <satyam@infradead.org> writes:


I think the CD contains both ISO-9660 and UDF filesystems, but the
latter is just faulty.

The disc would need to be analyzed.
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
iso9660 vs udf, Andries E. Brouwer, (Sat Sep 15, 5:49 pm)
Re: iso9660 vs udf, Phillip Susi, (Wed Sep 19, 5:51 pm)
Re: iso9660 vs udf, Karel Zak, (Wed Sep 19, 9:23 am)
Re: iso9660 vs udf, Andries E. Brouwer, (Wed Sep 19, 3:37 pm)
Re: iso9660 vs udf, Jan Kara, (Tue Sep 18, 10:47 am)
Re: iso9660 vs udf, Satyam Sharma, (Tue Sep 18, 8:18 pm)
Re: iso9660 vs udf, Andries E. Brouwer, (Tue Sep 18, 8:46 pm)
Re: iso9660 vs udf, Satyam Sharma, (Tue Sep 18, 10:35 pm)
Re: iso9660 vs udf, Krzysztof Halasa, (Wed Sep 19, 7:11 am)
Re: iso9660 vs udf, Andries E. Brouwer, (Wed Sep 19, 4:36 am)
Re: iso9660 vs udf, Kay Sievers, (Wed Sep 19, 7:36 am)
Re: iso9660 vs udf, Randy Dunlap, (Tue Sep 18, 10:44 pm)