Re: UML dead with current -git?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jeff Dike
Date: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 - 6:35 pm

On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 07:55:13PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

I believe what happened here is an x86_64 build followed by a
UML/x86_64 build with no intervening mrproper.

I've always considered this to be a "don't do that" sort of thing.
However, maybe we could stick the arch of the current build somewhere
in the tree, check that before any serious part of a subsequent
build, and error out if $ARCH is different.

				Jeff

-- 
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
UML dead with current -git?, Philipp Marek, (Tue Sep 18, 8:14 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Jeff Dike, (Tue Sep 18, 10:13 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Sam Ravnborg, (Tue Sep 18, 10:55 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Philipp Marek, (Tue Sep 18, 11:09 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Jeff Dike, (Tue Sep 18, 6:35 pm)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Philipp Marek, (Wed Sep 19, 5:43 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Randy Dunlap, (Wed Sep 19, 8:50 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Philipp Marek, (Wed Sep 19, 9:17 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Randy Dunlap, (Wed Sep 19, 10:47 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Jeff Dike, (Wed Sep 19, 11:05 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Ph. Marek, (Wed Sep 19, 10:42 pm)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Ph. Marek, (Wed Sep 19, 10:44 pm)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Sam Ravnborg, (Thu Sep 20, 12:01 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Philipp Marek, (Thu Sep 20, 12:25 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Sam Ravnborg, (Thu Sep 20, 1:26 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Randy Dunlap, (Thu Sep 20, 9:35 am)