Re: UML dead with current -git?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...>
Cc: Philipp Marek <philipp@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 - 9:35 pm

On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 07:55:13PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

I believe what happened here is an x86_64 build followed by a
UML/x86_64 build with no intervening mrproper.

I've always considered this to be a "don't do that" sort of thing.
However, maybe we could stick the arch of the current build somewhere
in the tree, check that before any serious part of a subsequent
build, and error out if $ARCH is different.

				Jeff

-- 
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
UML dead with current -git?, Philipp Marek, (Tue Sep 18, 11:14 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Jeff Dike, (Tue Sep 18, 1:13 pm)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Philipp Marek, (Tue Sep 18, 2:09 pm)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Sam Ravnborg, (Tue Sep 18, 1:55 pm)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Jeff Dike, (Tue Sep 18, 9:35 pm)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Philipp Marek, (Wed Sep 19, 8:43 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Randy Dunlap, (Wed Sep 19, 11:50 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Philipp Marek, (Wed Sep 19, 12:17 pm)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Randy Dunlap, (Wed Sep 19, 1:47 pm)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Ph. Marek, (Thu Sep 20, 1:42 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Randy Dunlap, (Thu Sep 20, 12:35 pm)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Jeff Dike, (Wed Sep 19, 2:05 pm)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Ph. Marek, (Thu Sep 20, 1:44 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Sam Ravnborg, (Thu Sep 20, 3:01 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Philipp Marek, (Thu Sep 20, 3:25 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Sam Ravnborg, (Thu Sep 20, 4:26 am)