* Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com> wrote:not at the moment - Antoine suggested that the workload is probably fine and the patch against -rc6 would have no clear effect anyway so we have nothing to merge right now. (Note that there's no "older behavior" possible, unless we want to emulate all of the O(1) scheduler's behavior.) But ... we could still merge something like that patch, but a clearer testcase is needed. The JVM's i have access to work fine. Ingo -
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 011/196] sysfs: Fix a copy-n-paste typo in comment |
| KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki | Re: 2.6.23-rc4-mm1 |
| Aubrey | O_DIRECT question |
git: | |
| Andy Parkins | Re: [RFC] Submodules in GIT |
| Shawn Pearce | Re: Notes on Using Git with Subprojects |
| Junio C Hamano | [RFD] On deprecating "git-foo" for builtins |
| Andrew Ruder | [PATCH] Add policy on user-interface changes |
| Steve Shockley | Re: Real men don't attack straw men |
| Marcos Laufer | dmesg IBM x3650 OpenBSD 4.3 |
| Woodchuck | Re: bcw(4) is gone |
| Renaud Allard | Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| john ye | [PATCH: 2.6.13-15-SMP 3/3] network: concurrently run softirq network code on SMP |
| Patrick McHardy | [NET_SCHED 04/15]: act_api: use nlmsg_parse |
| David Miller | Re: 2.6.25-rc8: FTP transfer errors |
