Can E. Acar wrote:Additional work went in, thus additional copyrights were added. In a purely open development environment, even personal developer trees are made public. That's the way we _want_ development to occur. Out in public, with a full audit trail. Your implied ideal scenario is tantamount to guaranteeing that mistakes are never committed to a public repository anywhere. Mistakes will happen. Even legal mistakes. In public. What you are seeing is an example of mistakes that were caught in review, and corrected. That's how any scalable review process works... the developer reviews his own work. the team reviews the developer's work. the maintainer reviews the team's work. the next maintainer reviews. and so on, to the top. Jeff -
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.27-rc8 |
| Jeff Chua | 2.6.27rc1 cannot boot more than 8CPUs |
| Yinghai Lu | Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in-kernel, use it in mor... |
| Russell King | Re: (hacky) [PATCH] silence MODPOST section mismatch warnings |
git: | |
| Steffen Prohaska | merge vs rebase: Is visualization in gitk the only problem? |
| Shawn O. Pearce | Re: clarify git clone --local --shared --reference |
| Wink Saville | Resolving conflicts |
| Linus Torvalds | People unaware of the importance of "git gc"? |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Kevin Neff | Patching a SSH 'Weakness' |
| Mayuresh Kathe | Re: What is our ultimate goal?? |
| Jonathan Thornburg | strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments |
| Stefan Richter | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| adobriyan | [PATCH 10/38] netns ct: per-netns expectations |
| "G" | Implementing RSTP and MSTP in Linux Kernel |
| Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo | Re: [PATCH 2/6] Phonet: connected sockets glue |
