Re: [patch 1/7] Immediate Values - Architecture Independent Code

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...>
Cc: <akpm@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 - 1:59 pm

* Denys Vlasenko (vda.linux@googlemail.com) wrote:

This last one could cause alignment problems. We either have to use the
proper ALIGN() before the section, or let AT(ADDR(__immediate) -
LOAD_OFFSET) take care of it. I prefer the latter.


I could, but I have been told to leave the immediateindex there even though
immediate values are configured out. I guess visual hideousness is the
main argument there.

Mathieu


-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 1/7] Immediate Values - Architecture Independent Code, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Mon Sep 17, 2:42 pm)
Re: [patch 1/7] Immediate Values - Architecture Independent ..., Mathieu Desnoyers, (Tue Sep 18, 1:59 pm)
Re: [patch 1/7] Immediate Values - Architecture Independent ..., Mathieu Desnoyers, (Tue Sep 18, 4:47 pm)
Re: [patch 1/7] Immediate Values - Architecture Independent ..., Mathieu Desnoyers, (Wed Sep 19, 7:27 am)