Re: UML dead with current -git?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Sam Ravnborg
Date: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 - 10:55 am

On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 01:13:13PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
Sounds to me like a known issue by you. Can you give a few more details
so we maybe can get it fixed?

	Sam
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
UML dead with current -git?, Philipp Marek, (Tue Sep 18, 8:14 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Jeff Dike, (Tue Sep 18, 10:13 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Sam Ravnborg, (Tue Sep 18, 10:55 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Philipp Marek, (Tue Sep 18, 11:09 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Jeff Dike, (Tue Sep 18, 6:35 pm)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Philipp Marek, (Wed Sep 19, 5:43 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Randy Dunlap, (Wed Sep 19, 8:50 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Philipp Marek, (Wed Sep 19, 9:17 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Randy Dunlap, (Wed Sep 19, 10:47 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Jeff Dike, (Wed Sep 19, 11:05 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Ph. Marek, (Wed Sep 19, 10:42 pm)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Ph. Marek, (Wed Sep 19, 10:44 pm)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Sam Ravnborg, (Thu Sep 20, 12:01 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Philipp Marek, (Thu Sep 20, 12:25 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Sam Ravnborg, (Thu Sep 20, 1:26 am)
Re: UML dead with current -git?, Randy Dunlap, (Thu Sep 20, 9:35 am)