On 9/18/07, Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:and did they really do enough? if those names shouldn't be there, why play childish games and insist on putting them in? and what so petty is there? who can show what those two added to the original work so that according to the law they are allowed to put their names in there? and who really cares about why you did this or did that? this OT sentence sounded like real childish BC. if you want to have fun while coding and share it with others - do it, if you want also to play contract games - do it; choose BSD or GPL and go with it. however, whatever you do you must respect laws. if the law says you can put your name in only if much of work is done, so it must be. there are no other variants. and everything will come back to you no matter whether it is good or bad. if you ignore laws using somebody's work, the same will be done to you one day. P.S. Let's just say that BC like that is why I decided to work with BSD instead of Linux 11 years ago. -
| Heiko Carstens | [patch -mm] s390: struct bin_attribute changes |
| Andrew Morton | 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 |
| Eric W. Biederman | Re: [PATCH] kexec: force x86_64 arches to boot kdump kernels on boot cpu |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jens Axboe | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Andrew Morton | Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes |
