Re: PROBLEM: Network sky2 Module

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Bill Davidsen
Date: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 - 7:28 am

ben soo wrote:
Yes, I have found that I get far less problem in this area leaving the 
MTU at 1500, then putting a larger MTU (usually 9000) into the routing 
table for segments, or even just machines, where I know there is direct 
connectivity. I use 9000 MTU with my directly connected file server, 
1500 elsewhere. I can go to 9000 for nbd servers as well, assuming the 
connection doesn't pass a firewall.

I have some hints that while the switches I use will speak 10/100/1000 
between machines with different speeds, and will handle jumbo packets 
between machines at the same speed, if I'm going Gbit/jumbo to 
1500/slower performance seems to suffer more than talking smaller 
packets. That may be because window size needs to be even larger or 
something.

I have some legacy machines talking 10Mbit/half on 10base2 cable, I may 
be seeing more of this than the average site. That's legacy as in 
"attached to something expensive to replace."

-- 
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
   "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
PROBLEM: Network sky2 Module, Werner Meurer, (Sat Sep 8, 8:14 am)
Re: PROBLEM: Network sky2 Module, ben soo, (Mon Sep 17, 9:02 pm)
Re: PROBLEM: Network sky2 Module, Bill Davidsen, (Tue Sep 18, 7:28 am)
Re: PROBLEM: Network sky2 Module, Stephen Hemminger, (Tue Sep 18, 8:05 am)
Re: PROBLEM: Network sky2 Module, ben soo, (Wed Sep 19, 11:43 pm)
Re: PROBLEM: Network sky2 Module, kernel version 2.6.23-rc7, Stephen Hemminger, (Sun Sep 23, 11:06 pm)