Re: RFC: A revised timerfd API

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David
Date: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 - 6:13 am

On Tue, September 18, 2007 13:30, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

I think alternative b) - three new syscalls, sounds better.

The only negatives so far are that it adds more syscalls and that it might
require code duplication with posix timers. The syscall numbers argument
seemed not to be very important and the code duplication should be fixable
by refactoring the code so that more is shared between the two systems (I
assume).

Overloading file descriptors with flags looks ugly, is there any other
syscall which does that?

-- 
David Härdeman
(sorry Thomas for the dupe, I missed replying to all on the first msg).


-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
RFC: A revised timerfd API, Michael Kerrisk, (Tue Sep 18, 12:27 am)
Re: RFC: A revised timerfd API, Michael Kerrisk, (Tue Sep 18, 12:30 am)
Re: RFC: A revised timerfd API, David , (Tue Sep 18, 1:05 am)
Re: RFC: A revised timerfd API, Michael Kerrisk, (Tue Sep 18, 2:01 am)
Re: RFC: A revised timerfd API, Thomas Gleixner, (Tue Sep 18, 2:10 am)
Re: RFC: A revised timerfd API, Thomas Gleixner, (Tue Sep 18, 2:27 am)
Re: RFC: A revised timerfd API, Michael Kerrisk, (Tue Sep 18, 2:30 am)
Re: RFC: A revised timerfd API, Thomas Gleixner, (Tue Sep 18, 2:42 am)
Re: RFC: A revised timerfd API, Michael Kerrisk, (Tue Sep 18, 4:08 am)
Re: RFC: A revised timerfd API, Thomas Gleixner, (Tue Sep 18, 4:30 am)
Re: RFC: A revised timerfd API, David , (Tue Sep 18, 6:13 am)
Re: RFC: A revised timerfd API, Davide Libenzi, (Tue Sep 18, 9:51 am)
Re: RFC: A revised timerfd API, Michael Kerrisk, (Sat Sep 22, 6:03 am)
Re: RFC: A revised timerfd API, Michael Kerrisk, (Sat Sep 22, 6:12 am)
Re: RFC: A revised timerfd API, Bernd Eckenfels, (Sat Sep 22, 7:32 am)
Re: RFC: A revised timerfd API, Michael Kerrisk, (Sat Sep 22, 9:07 am)
Re: RFC: A revised timerfd API, Thomas Gleixner, (Sat Sep 22, 10:05 am)
Re: RFC: A revised timerfd API, Thomas Gleixner, (Sat Sep 22, 10:10 am)
Re: RFC: A revised timerfd API, Davide Libenzi, (Sat Sep 22, 2:07 pm)
Re: RFC: A revised timerfd API, Thomas Gleixner, (Sat Sep 22, 2:26 pm)
Re: RFC: A revised timerfd API, Davide Libenzi, (Sat Sep 22, 4:21 pm)
Re: RFC: A revised timerfd API, David , (Sat Sep 22, 4:37 pm)
Re: RFC: A revised timerfd API, Michael Kerrisk, (Sun Sep 23, 10:33 am)
Re: RFC: A revised timerfd API, Davide Libenzi, (Sun Sep 23, 11:33 am)
Re: RFC: A revised timerfd API, Davide Libenzi, (Sun Sep 23, 11:41 am)
Re: RFC: A revised timerfd API, Michael Kerrisk, (Sun Sep 23, 12:03 pm)