login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
September
»
18
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Rob Hussey <robjhussey@...>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@...>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <ck@...>
Subject:
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up
Date: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 - 12:58 am
On 9/18/07, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
quoted text
> Hi Rob, > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 12:30:05AM -0400, Rob Hussey wrote: > > I should have pointed out before that I don't really have a dual-core > > system, just a P4 with Hyper-Threading (I loosely used core to refer > > to processor). > > Just for reference, we call them "siblings", not "cores" on HT. I believe > that a line "Sibling:" appears in /proc/cpuinfo BTW.
Thanks, I was searching for the right word but couldn't come up with it. -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up
, Rob Hussey
, (Mon Sep 17, 5:21 am)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up
, Ingo Molnar
, (Mon Sep 17, 9:05 am)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up
, Rob Hussey
, (Mon Sep 17, 9:44 pm)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up
, Ingo Molnar
, (Mon Sep 17, 4:36 pm)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up
, Rob Hussey
, (Tue Sep 18, 12:30 am)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up
, Ingo Molnar
, (Tue Sep 18, 4:48 am)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up
, Rob Hussey
, (Tue Sep 18, 5:45 am)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up
, Ingo Molnar
, (Tue Sep 18, 5:48 am)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up
, Ingo Molnar
, (Tue Sep 18, 2:40 am)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up
, Rob Hussey
, (Tue Sep 18, 4:23 am)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up
, Willy Tarreau
, (Tue Sep 18, 12:53 am)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up
, Rob Hussey
, (Tue Sep 18, 12:58 am)
Re: [ck] Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up
, Jos Poortvliet
, (Mon Sep 17, 10:01 am)
Re: [ck] Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up
, Ingo Molnar
, (Mon Sep 17, 10:12 am)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up
, Ingo Molnar
, (Mon Sep 17, 7:27 am)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up
, Ed Tomlinson
, (Mon Sep 17, 7:12 am)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up
, Ingo Molnar
, (Mon Sep 17, 4:22 pm)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up
, Ingo Molnar
, (Mon Sep 17, 7:47 am)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Parag Warudkar
BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
Tarkan Erimer
Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 010/196] Chinese: add translation of Codingstyle
Andrew Morton
-mm merge plans for 2.6.23
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 24/37] dccp: Processing Confirm options
David Miller
Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Alexey Dobriyan
Re: [GIT]: Networking
david
Re: iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
3 users
and
685 guests
online.
Online users
letsgotouring
zeekec
johnmorlo772
Syndicate