On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 10:06:40PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:Nothing prevents Roman and I to exchange our respective points of views on LKML when those are about other activities on the list, I don't get your point. I find particularly weird the way you hijacked an existing thread adding references to a 4-days old mail and adding people in Cc just as one would add fuel to try to start any sort of flamewar. Sorry for you, but this has no chance to succeed. First, don't consider that people are ennemies just because they use harsh words to tell each other what they feel about a specific subject (otherwise, you'd find hundreds of ennemies of everyone here). Second, if there are some aspects of the mail above that you want explained, you can mail us privately, you're not necessarily forced to hijack an unrelated discussion. Now I'm not interested in following up into this thread, it's already polluted. Please let people here discuss numbers and experiments. Thanks, Willy -
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| David Miller | Slow DOWN, please!!! |
| Peter Zijlstra | [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8 |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
git: | |
