Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2007 » September » 17

Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Ingo Molnar
Subject: Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up
Date: Monday, September 17, 2007 - 1:22 pm

* Ed Tomlinson <edt@aei.ca> wrote:


yeah. The biggest item in -ck besides SD is swap-prefetch, but that 
shouldnt have an effect in this case. I _think_ that most of the 
measured difference is due to scheduler details though. Right now my 
estimation is that with the patch i sent to Rob, and with latest 
sched-devel.git, CFS should perform as good or better than SD, even in 
these micro-benchmarks. (but i cannot tell what will happen on Rob's 
machine - so i'm keeping an open mind towards any other fixables :-) I'm 
curious about the next round of numbers (if Rob has time to do them).

	Ingo
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up, Rob Hussey, (Mon Sep 17, 2:21 am)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up, Ed Tomlinson, (Mon Sep 17, 4:12 am)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Sep 17, 4:27 am)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Sep 17, 4:47 am)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Sep 17, 6:05 am)
Re: [ck] Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up, Jos Poortvliet, (Mon Sep 17, 7:01 am)
Re: [ck] Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Sep 17, 7:12 am)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Sep 17, 1:22 pm)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Sep 17, 1:36 pm)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up, Rob Hussey, (Mon Sep 17, 6:44 pm)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up, Rob Hussey, (Mon Sep 17, 9:30 pm)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up, Willy Tarreau, (Mon Sep 17, 9:53 pm)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up, Rob Hussey, (Mon Sep 17, 9:58 pm)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Sep 17, 11:40 pm)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up, Rob Hussey, (Tue Sep 18, 1:23 am)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Sep 18, 1:48 am)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up, Rob Hussey, (Tue Sep 18, 2:45 am)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Sep 18, 2:48 am)