Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Oleg Verych <olecom@...>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@...>, Roman Zippel <zippel@...>, Rob Hussey <robjhussey@...>, <efault@...>, <a.p.zijlstra@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <ck@...>
Date: Monday, September 17, 2007 - 4:05 pm

* Oleg Verych <olecom@flower.upol.cz> wrote:


i'm even more confused. Could you please explain your point to me? I 
really cannot follow your argument. Thanks,

	Ingo
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up, Willy Tarreau, (Mon Sep 17, 3:43 pm)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Sep 17, 4:01 pm)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up, Oleg Verych, (Mon Sep 17, 4:06 pm)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up, Willy Tarreau, (Mon Sep 17, 4:42 pm)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Sep 17, 4:05 pm)