Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Willy Tarreau <w@...>
Cc: Oleg Verych <olecom@...>, Roman Zippel <zippel@...>, Rob Hussey <robjhussey@...>, <efault@...>, <a.p.zijlstra@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <ck@...>
Date: Monday, September 17, 2007 - 4:01 pm

* Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:


i'm wondering too.

in my posted debugging answer, instead of replying privately to Rob, i 
have also Cc:-ed lkml and ck-list. (perhaps i shouldnt even have Cc:-ed 
the lists, as my posted debugging questions and suggestions were mostly 
relevant to Rob and to me - but it's better to keep such things archived 
on the lists, if someone wants to read them. In the first mail i also 
Cc:-ed Mike and Peter who changed the scheduler recently - but i dropped 
them after my first reply when it became apparent that it's not their 
changes that are affected. With all lists still Cc:-ed, so that people 
can follow it if they really want to.)

I'd expect any new results to be posted by Rob to everyone he wishes to 
send them to - like he did it in the past.

Or is Oleg perhaps complaining about the fact that i Cc:-ed this back to 
both affected email lists, for everyone to read? Would be a weird 
argument.

	Ingo
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up, Willy Tarreau, (Mon Sep 17, 3:43 pm)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Sep 17, 4:01 pm)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up, Oleg Verych, (Mon Sep 17, 4:06 pm)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up, Willy Tarreau, (Mon Sep 17, 4:42 pm)
Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Sep 17, 4:05 pm)