Jacob Meuser wrote:All very nicely said. I'd like to add that an insult implicit in the attempt to remove the BSD license is that it says to the original authors, "we plan to improve this code, and when we do you'll never again be able to ship it as BSD." They weren't the words, but that's what you get when you think to the future. Although opinions seem still to be divided, I think everyone has been reminded that just because you can doesn't mean you should. The one shining light in this whole sorry Atheros saga is that it's now all history; the only people still talking about it are people not directly involved. The matter could now rest... -
| Greg KH | Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-)) |
| Greg KH | [patch 26/73] NET: Correct two mistaken skb_reset_mac_header() conversions. |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 007/196] Chinese: add translation of stable_kernel_rules.txt |
| Alan Cox | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
git: | |
| Alexey Dobriyan | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Andrew Morton | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
