Hello Ulrich, Thanks for taking time to respond ! On 9/16/07, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@gmail.com> wrote:You're right. I don't know why I thought vdso was older... Does that mean we'll need to keep 3 different implementations of gtod in the kernel forever ? I think signal trampolines will still need them too. So making vsyscalls configurable doesn't seem to work, does it ? I took a look to glibc-2.4 and it doesn't seem to use __kernel_vsyscall vsyscall. Am I wrong ? If so could you point me where it's used in the code ? Another not so related question, hope you don't mind :) I'm having hard time to understand how ld.so is working, specially the dynamic symbol resolution after looking at the glibc code and reading the ELF specification. Do you know any others documents that could help ? Thanks a lot. -- Francis -
| Eric Paris | [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interface for on access scanning |
| Mark Fasheh | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.21-rc4 |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| Christoph Lameter | Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 |
