On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 06:35:12PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote:You did say otherwise. Your claim was that "You can obtain, *from the GPL*, the right to remove a BSD license notice." This claim is bullshit. You can get this right from the copyright holder, e.g. when he dual-licenced his code, but you can not get this right from the GPL. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.21-rc5 |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.26-rc4 |
| Christoph Hellwig | Re: [PATCH] Version 3 (2.6.23-rc8) Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel |
| Bryan Woods | Stardom SATA HSM violation |
git: | |
| Linus Torvalds | People unaware of the importance of "git gc"? |
| Jan Holesovsky | [PATCH] RFC: git lazy clone proof-of-concept |
| Linus Torvalds | cleaner/better zlib sources? |
| martin f krafft | Re: Track /etc directory using Git |
| Chris | OpenBSD 4.4 installation error: write failed; file system full |
| Brian A. Seklecki | sshd_config(5) PermitRootLogin yes |
| steve szmidt | Re: The Atheros story in much fewer words |
| David Newman | setting dscp or tos bits |
| Jim Winstead Jr. | Re: Root Disk/Book Disk Compatibility |
| Jan Nicolai Langfeldt | Re: Hypenation problems under LaTeX. |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: Missing linux/delay.h??? |
| Stew Ellis | Trouble with minicom scripts |
