Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@...>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>, Can E. Acar <can.acar@...>, <misc@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...>, Eben Moglen <moglen@...>, Lawrence Lessig <lessig_from_web@...>, Bradley M. Kuhn <bkuhn@...>, Matt Norwood <norwood@...>
if it's legal it's legal. it's not a matter of the Linux community being
satisfied eith it, it's a matter of the BSD people desiring it based on
their selection of license (and the repeated statements that this feature
of the BSD license being an advantage compared to the GPL makes it clear
that this isn't an unknown side effect, it's an explicit desire).
so the Linux community is following the desires of the BSD community by
following their license but the BSD community is unhappy, why?
you claim that it's unethical for the linux community to use the code, but
brag about NetApp useing the code. what makes NetApp ok and Linux evil?
many people honestly don't understand the logic behind this. please
explain it.
if you don't like what your license allows, change it. it's trivial for
you to do so, all you need to do is to agree on a new license and start
releaseing your code under it (the BSD license allows for derivitive works
to be released under any license) make the new license match your real
desires and this sort of problem can be avoided in the future.
David Lang
-
