Can E. Acar wrote:Regarding "Linux Kernel developers," false. _I_ have posted. ath5k, wireless, and net driver maintainers have all sent emails. License and code fixes have been committed. As for the FSF: It has been repeatedly stated that the FSF has zip to do with this. Nothing. Nada. Zero. Zilch. Linux != FSF. You are failing to observe that changes have been made in response to criticism. Given that Linux Kernel devs have responded both with code changes and emails, "silence" and "inaction" are provably false. And since the changes go ath5k->linville->me->linus or ath5k->linville->me->davem->linus, I am a step in the approval chain. I do know what I'm talking about. :) Jeff -
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.27-rc8 |
| Christoph Lameter | Re: Major regression on hackbench with SLUB (more numbers) |
| Mike Travis | Re: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Hugh Dickins | Re: [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin" |
