Re: kbuild update

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@...>
Cc: kbuild devel <kbuild-devel@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>
Date: Sunday, September 16, 2007 - 11:13 am

On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 08:58:03AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
This is useful for specific people but not for kernel janitorial fodder.
As you already experience the amount of false positive are too high.

But for a developer of a module it is no deal to ignore the false
positives.

It is for godd reasons not integrated in the build process.

	Sam
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
kbuild update, Sam Ravnborg, (Sun Sep 16, 5:47 am)
Re: kbuild update, Robert P. J. Day, (Sun Sep 16, 8:58 am)
Re: kbuild update, Andrew Morton, (Sun Sep 16, 3:23 pm)
Re: kbuild update, Sam Ravnborg, (Sun Sep 16, 4:38 pm)
Re: kbuild update, Sam Ravnborg, (Sun Sep 16, 11:13 am)
Re: kbuild update, Robert P. J. Day, (Sun Sep 16, 11:21 am)