Re: kbuild update

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...>
Cc: kbuild devel <kbuild-devel@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>
Date: Sunday, September 16, 2007 - 8:58 am

On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

...

based on my experiences with this, unless you filter carefully, you're
going to end up with a *whack* of false positives given the number of
developers who elect to name their local macros starting with a prefix
of "CONFIG_".  good luck dealing with *that*.  :-)

rday

-- 
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

http://crashcourse.ca
========================================================================
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
kbuild update, Sam Ravnborg, (Sun Sep 16, 5:47 am)
Re: kbuild update, Robert P. J. Day, (Sun Sep 16, 8:58 am)
Re: kbuild update, Andrew Morton, (Sun Sep 16, 3:23 pm)
Re: kbuild update, Sam Ravnborg, (Sun Sep 16, 4:38 pm)
Re: kbuild update, Sam Ravnborg, (Sun Sep 16, 11:13 am)
Re: kbuild update, Robert P. J. Day, (Sun Sep 16, 11:21 am)