Re: [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure (v2)

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...>
Cc: <kvm-devel@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Dor Laor <dor.laor@...>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Zachary Amsden <zach@...>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...>, Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...>
Date: Sunday, September 16, 2007 - 5:08 am

Anthony Liguori wrote:

This needs to be done from userspace, so that kvm can pretend not to 
have this leaf.

(I have no objection to our userspace doing it unconditionally; but I 
don't want to force it on others)

Also, the signature string is too generic.



Please split out the emulator changes.


Please document the new ABI.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure (v2), Anthony Liguori, (Sat Sep 15, 1:54 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure (v2), Avi Kivity, (Sun Sep 16, 5:08 am)