login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
September
»
15
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...>
To: Zachary Amsden <zach@...>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...>, <kvm-devel@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Avi Kivity <avi@...>
Subject:
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
Date: Saturday, September 15, 2007 - 1:33 pm
Zachary Amsden wrote:
quoted text
> On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 16:44 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > >> So then each module creates a hypercall page using this magic MSR and >> the hypervisor has to keep track of it so that it can appropriately >> change the page on migration. The page can only contain a single >> instruction or else it cannot be easily changed (or you have to be able >> to prevent the guest from being migrated while in the hypercall page). >> >> We're really talking about identical models. Instead of an MSR, the #GP >> is what tells the hypervisor to update the instruction. The nice thing >> about this is that you don't have to keep track of all the current >> hypercall page locations in the hypervisor. >> > > I agree, multiple hypercall pages is insane. I was thinking more of a > single hypercall page, fixed in place by the hypervisor, not the kernel. > > Then each module can read an MSR saying what VA the hypercall page is > at, and the hypervisor can simply flip one page to switch architectures. >
That requires a memory hole though. In KVM, we don't have a memory hole. Regards, Anthony Liguori
quoted text
> Zach > >
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Anthony Liguori
, (Fri Sep 14, 3:45 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
, (Fri Sep 14, 4:53 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Rusty Russell
, (Fri Sep 14, 10:35 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Anthony Liguori
, (Fri Sep 14, 5:02 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Avi Kivity
, (Sat Sep 15, 3:53 am)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
, (Fri Sep 14, 5:22 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Anthony Liguori
, (Fri Sep 14, 5:46 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
, (Fri Sep 14, 5:52 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Anthony Liguori
, (Fri Sep 14, 6:08 pm)
RE: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Nakajima, Jun
, (Fri Sep 14, 6:40 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Avi Kivity
, (Sat Sep 15, 4:00 am)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
, (Fri Sep 14, 7:00 pm)
RE: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Nakajima, Jun
, (Fri Sep 14, 8:10 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
, (Fri Sep 14, 8:28 pm)
RE: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Nakajima, Jun
, (Fri Sep 14, 9:04 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
, (Sat Sep 15, 12:53 am)
RE: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Nakajima, Jun
, (Sat Sep 15, 2:11 am)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Anthony Liguori
, (Sat Sep 15, 2:23 pm)
RE: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Nakajima, Jun
, (Mon Sep 17, 2:14 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
, (Mon Sep 17, 3:15 pm)
RE: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Nakajima, Jun
, (Mon Sep 17, 4:52 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Anthony Liguori
, (Mon Sep 17, 2:27 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
, (Mon Sep 17, 3:15 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Anthony Liguori
, (Mon Sep 17, 3:33 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Zachary Amsden
, (Fri Sep 14, 5:20 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Anthony Liguori
, (Fri Sep 14, 5:44 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Zachary Amsden
, (Fri Sep 14, 11:37 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Anthony Liguori
, (Sat Sep 15, 1:33 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Avi Kivity
, (Sat Sep 15, 4:08 am)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Tarkan Erimer
Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Greg KH
[GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24
James Bottomley
Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-))
Trent Piepho
Re: [PATCH] fakephp: Allocate PCI resources before adding the device
linux-netdev
:
Antonio Almeida
HTB accuracy for high speed
David Miller
[GIT]: Networking
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
git
:
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
1 user
and
754 guests
online.
Online users
lojasparrty
Syndicate