login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
September
»
15
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Anthony Liguori
Subject:
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
Date: Saturday, September 15, 2007 - 10:33 am
Zachary Amsden wrote:
quoted text
> On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 16:44 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > >> So then each module creates a hypercall page using this magic MSR and >> the hypervisor has to keep track of it so that it can appropriately >> change the page on migration. The page can only contain a single >> instruction or else it cannot be easily changed (or you have to be able >> to prevent the guest from being migrated while in the hypercall page). >> >> We're really talking about identical models. Instead of an MSR, the #GP >> is what tells the hypervisor to update the instruction. The nice thing >> about this is that you don't have to keep track of all the current >> hypercall page locations in the hypervisor. >> > > I agree, multiple hypercall pages is insane. I was thinking more of a > single hypercall page, fixed in place by the hypervisor, not the kernel. > > Then each module can read an MSR saying what VA the hypercall page is > at, and the hypervisor can simply flip one page to switch architectures. >
That requires a memory hole though. In KVM, we don't have a memory hole. Regards, Anthony Liguori
quoted text
> Zach > >
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Anthony Liguori
, (Fri Sep 14, 12:45 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
, (Fri Sep 14, 1:53 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Anthony Liguori
, (Fri Sep 14, 2:02 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Zachary Amsden
, (Fri Sep 14, 2:20 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
, (Fri Sep 14, 2:22 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Anthony Liguori
, (Fri Sep 14, 2:44 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Anthony Liguori
, (Fri Sep 14, 2:46 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
, (Fri Sep 14, 2:52 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Anthony Liguori
, (Fri Sep 14, 3:08 pm)
RE: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Nakajima, Jun
, (Fri Sep 14, 3:40 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
, (Fri Sep 14, 4:00 pm)
RE: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Nakajima, Jun
, (Fri Sep 14, 5:10 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
, (Fri Sep 14, 5:28 pm)
RE: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Nakajima, Jun
, (Fri Sep 14, 6:04 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Rusty Russell
, (Fri Sep 14, 7:35 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Zachary Amsden
, (Fri Sep 14, 8:37 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
, (Fri Sep 14, 9:53 pm)
RE: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Nakajima, Jun
, (Fri Sep 14, 11:11 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Avi Kivity
, (Sat Sep 15, 12:53 am)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Avi Kivity
, (Sat Sep 15, 1:00 am)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Avi Kivity
, (Sat Sep 15, 1:08 am)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Anthony Liguori
, (Sat Sep 15, 10:33 am)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Anthony Liguori
, (Sat Sep 15, 11:23 am)
RE: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Nakajima, Jun
, (Mon Sep 17, 11:14 am)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Anthony Liguori
, (Mon Sep 17, 11:27 am)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
, (Mon Sep 17, 12:15 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
, (Mon Sep 17, 12:15 pm)
Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Anthony Liguori
, (Mon Sep 17, 12:33 pm)
RE: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
, Nakajima, Jun
, (Mon Sep 17, 1:52 pm)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Ken Chen
[patch] sched: fix inconsistency when redistribute per-cpu tg->cfs_rq shares.
Ingo Molnar
Re: [PATCH v3] x86: merge the simple bitops and move them to bitops.h
Paul Turner
[tg_shares_up rewrite v4 11/11] sched: update tg->shares after cpu.shares write
Andi Kleen
Re: - romsignature-checksum-cleanup-2.patch removed from -mm tree
Axel Lin
[PATCH] tc6393xb: fix wrong goto labels for error handling
git
:
Christian Jaeger
Re: Problem with Git.pm bidi_pipe methods
Linus Torvalds
Re: mingw, windows, crlf/lf, and git
Nicolas Pitre
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Implement a simple delta_base cache
Linus Torvalds
[PATCH 1/7] Make unpack_trees_options bit flags actual bitfields
Jeff King
[PATCH 1/4] t4012: use test_cmp instead of cmp
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
i2c-i801: Add Intel Cougar Point device IDs
Linux Kernel Mailing List
Staging: batman-adv: splitting /proc vis file into vis_server and vis_data
Linux Kernel Mailing List
drm/i915: Add information on pinning and fencing to the i915 list debug.
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ocfs2: Stop orphan scan as early as possible during umount
Linux Kernel Mailing List
x86, apic: clean up spurious vector sanity check
linux-netdev
:
Richard Cochran
Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] ptp: Added a clock that uses the eTSEC found on the MPC85xx.
Gerrit Renker
v2 [PATCH 1/4] dccp: Limit feature negotiation to connection setup phase
Lennert Buytenhek
Re: [PATCH 3/6] [NET] dsa: add support for original DSA tagging format
Inaky Perez-Gonzalez
[PATCH 40/40] wimax/i2400m: add CREDITS and MAINTAINERS entries
Pavel Emelyanov
[PATCH net-2.6.26 2/2][NETNS]: The generic per-net pointers.
freebsd-current
:
Boris Samorodov
Re: twa + dump = sbwait
John Baldwin
Re: Possible case of sched_ule never honoring cpu_set affinity?
韓家標 Bill Hacker
Re: ZFS honesty
samira
sata atapi on ich9r
Bjoern A. Zeeb
Re: Can not boot 7.0-BETA3 with IPSEC
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate