Re: [PATCH] Configurable reclaim batch size

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@...>
Cc: <linux-mm@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Friday, September 14, 2007 - 7:20 pm

On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 15:23 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:

It increases the lock hold times though. Otoh it might work out with the
lock placement.

Do you have any numbers that show this is worthwhile?



-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] Configurable reclaim batch size , Christoph Lameter, (Fri Sep 14, 6:23 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Configurable reclaim batch size, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Sep 14, 7:20 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Configurable reclaim batch size, Christoph Lameter, (Mon Sep 17, 1:54 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Configurable reclaim batch size, Peter Zijlstra, (Mon Sep 17, 3:56 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Configurable reclaim batch size, Balbir Singh, (Mon Sep 17, 4:48 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Configurable reclaim batch size, Christoph Lameter, (Mon Sep 17, 5:24 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Configurable reclaim batch size, Christoph Lameter, (Mon Sep 17, 4:05 pm)