login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
September
»
14
Re: Per option CFLAGS?
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>
To: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...>
Cc: Kai Germaschewski <kai@...>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...>, ALSA devel <alsa-devel@...>
Subject:
Re: Per option CFLAGS?
Date: Friday, September 14, 2007 - 7:13 pm
Rene Herman wrote:
quoted text
> Hi Kai, Sam. > > I have a single file foo.c that I want to generate two (ALSA) modules > from, snd-foo2000.ko and snd-foo2001.ko, by compiling with either > FOO2000 or FOO2001 defined. > > I can do this, and ALSA does this a few times, by providing dummy > foo2000.c and foo2001.c files, like: > > === foo2000.c > #define FOO2000 > #include "foo.c" > === > > and a regular Makefile > > === > foo2000-objs := foo2000.o > foo2001-objs := foo2001.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_SND_FOO2000) += snd-foo2000.o > obj-$(CONFIG_SND_F002001) += snd-foo2001.o > === > > That #include is a little lame though. Is there a nicer way? I noticed > the per-file CFLAGS, but given that it's one source file for both, that > doesn't fit. >
The stub source file is usually considered a good way to do this. -hpa -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
Per option CFLAGS?
, Rene Herman
, (Fri Sep 14, 7:07 pm)
Re: Per option CFLAGS?
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Fri Sep 14, 7:13 pm)
Re: Per option CFLAGS?
, Rene Herman
, (Fri Sep 14, 7:30 pm)
Re: Per option CFLAGS?
, Adrian Bunk
, (Sat Sep 15, 4:47 am)
Re: Per option CFLAGS?
, Rene Herman
, (Sat Sep 15, 11:17 am)
Re: Per option CFLAGS?
, Denys Vlasenko
, (Sat Sep 15, 11:53 am)
Re: Per option CFLAGS?
, Rene Herman
, (Sat Sep 15, 11:59 am)
Re: Per option CFLAGS?
, Adrian Bunk
, (Sat Sep 15, 11:52 am)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches
Alan Stern
Re: 2.6.22-rc2-mm1
Satyam Sharma
Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
William Lee Irwin III
Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Dale Farnsworth
Re: [PATCH 03/39] mv643xx_eth: shorten reg names
Jarek Poplawski
Re: HTB accuracy for high speed
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
4 users
and
1052 guests
online.
Online users
zeekec
louisvillebody
shifterkart2009
MiaCline
Syndicate