Re: Distributed storage. Move away from char device ioctls.

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...>
Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@...>, <netdev@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-fsdevel@...>
Date: Friday, September 14, 2007 - 5:14 pm

J. Bruce Fields wrote:


Don't bother supporting attributes, file modes, and other details not 
supported by POSIX.  The prime example being NFSv4, which is larded down 
with Windows features.

NFSv4.1 adds to the fun, by throwing interoperability completely out the 
window.

	Jeff



-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Distributed storage. Move away from char device ioctls., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Fri Sep 14, 2:54 pm)
Re: Distributed storage. Move away from char device ioctls., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Sat Sep 15, 8:29 am)
Re: Distributed storage. Move away from char device ioctls., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Sun Sep 16, 9:43 am)
Re: Distributed storage. Move away from char device ioctls., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Fri Oct 26, 6:44 am)
Re: Distributed storage. Move away from char device ioctls., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Sat Sep 15, 8:34 am)
Re: Distributed storage. Move away from char device ioctls., J. Bruce Fields, (Fri Sep 14, 5:12 pm)
Re: Distributed storage. Move away from char device ioctls., Jeff Garzik, (Fri Sep 14, 5:14 pm)
Re: Distributed storage. Move away from char device ioctls., J. Bruce Fields, (Fri Sep 14, 5:18 pm)
Re: Distributed storage. Move away from char device ioctls., J. Bruce Fields, (Fri Sep 14, 6:42 pm)
Re: Distributed storage. Move away from char device ioctls., J. Bruce Fields, (Sat Sep 15, 12:40 am)