On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 18:50:12 +0200 (CEST)
Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
quoted text
> > You never directly replied to these pretty explicit requests, all
> > you did was this side remark 5 days later in one of your patch 
> > announcements:
> 
> This is ridiculous, I asked you multiple times to explain to me some
> of the differences relative to CFS as response to the splitup
> requests. Not once did you react, you didn't even ask what I'd like
> to know specifically.

Roman,

this is... a strange comment. It almost sounds like you were holding
the splitup hostage depending on some other thing happening.... that's
not a good attitude in my book. Having big-blob patches that do many
things at the same time leads to them being impossible to apply. Linux
works by having smaller incrementals. You know that; you've been around
for a long time.

Complaining that someone finally did splitup work after you refused,
and even puts credit in for you... that's beyond my comprehension.
Sorry.

-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/