On 9/14/07, Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@analog.com> wrote:
quoted text
> On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 13:03 +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> > Bryan Wu wrote:
> > >>> but mremap doesn't -- there's even an implementation in mm/nommu.c.
> > >>> Could you check the rest of these over to see if they truly don't need
> > >>> to be implemented for no-mmu?
> > >> you're right we want mremap, my fault
> > >>
> > >
> > > Yes, I do think so, both sys_mremap and sys_munmap are implemented in
> > > mm/nommu.c. How do think of this, Bernd?
> >
> > There's a mremap in nommu.c, but it doesn't do a lot that is useful.
> > With some further mm changes in our tree, it's little more than a fancy
> > way of saying munmap, and uClibc does not use it, so there's no
> > compelling need to have it in userspace.
>
> Make sense. So currently Blackfin uClinux use the mremap/munmap in
> uClibc?

most functions like this dont have any real libc component ... uClibc
will define userspace symbols that merely make a syscall iff the __NR_
exists in the headers

if we have __NR_mremap in our unistd.h, we'll automagically get the
mremap() symbol in uClibc which simply passes along the args to the
kernel
-mike
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/